The Pechersky district court of Kyiv has appointed computer-technical examination and examination of the audio recording on which the person with the voice similar to the Director of the National anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) Artem Sytnik, talks about his role during the elections of the President of the United States.
According to the court order of April 8, 2019, published in the state register of court decisions, the examination should undertaken by experts of the Ukrainian research Institute of special equipment and forensic examinations of the security Service of Ukraine.
In the reasoning of the decision States that the attorney General’s office of Ukraine appealed to the judge for examination in criminal proceedings No. 42019000000000566 from 14 March 2019 initiated on the appeal of Deputy of abuse of authority by employees of NABOO, to which was attached a copy of the judgment and a flash drive.
“The content of this treatment it was found that the audio file was recorded talking about the person’s voice like the voice of the Director of NABU, from which it is seen that the latter used his official position contrary to interests of service to interfere in the electoral process on election of the President of the United States of America and support one of the candidates and downgrade the other candidate for the post of President of the United States through the disclosure of data of preliminary investigation in criminal proceedings related to the statements contained in the list of “black accounting” Party of regions”, – is told in motivation part of the decision.
According to information from court orders in the course of the search 27 March 2019 in hunting farm “woodlands-Sarny” (Rivne region, Rivne district , POS Strasheve) revealed the card with the audio files, which likely contain records of conversations with persons whose voice is like the voice of the Director of NABU content that may indicate criminal offences.
In this regard, the body of a pretrial investigation it was necessary to figure out technical terms and the technology for the production of sound at the place fixed conversations with A. rush, as well as to identify him physically voice.
In view of this, the Pechersky regional court decided the petition of the Prosecutor of the Prosecutor General to meet and apply complex computer-technical examination and examination of the sound recordings of audio files.
In particular, the experts of the Ukrainian research Institute of special equipment and judicial examinations of the SBU should determine whether the phonogram on the card is “2019-01-01–16-42-49”, “2019-01-01–16-45-50”, “2019-01-01–16-48-50” originals? Did A. Sytnik participation in the tape recorded conversations in files “2019-01-01–16-42-49”, “2019-01-01–16-45-50”, “2019-01-01–16-48-50”, contained on the card is between 29 December 2018 3 January 2019, and what specific words and phrases spoken to him? How many people participated in the tape recorded conversations?
What is the point of phonograms conversations contained in these files?
Earlier in the day, it was reported that the Prosecutor General’s office of Ukraine is Director of NABU Artem Sytnik on Friday, may 10, in for questioning as a witness in criminal proceedings on the fact of exceeding of authority.
As reported, on March 15, 2019 in the program “Right to rule” Prosecutor General Yury Lutsenko reported about received applications from non-faction people’s Deputy Boris Rosenblatt, who argued about the alleged transfer by the Director of NABU A. Sytnyk in the United States the so-called”black accounting” of the Party of regions to support Hillary Clinton in the presidential election. He added that the RRG will soon start processing the case.
March 22 NABOO said his detectives did not collect and did not give anybody any evidence of illegal activities of American political strategist Paul Manafort NABOO, and refuted the statement of Yu. Lutsenko about their possible impact on the United States presidential election, calling it an absurd attempt to discredit the Bureau.
In turn, the head of SAP Nazar Golodnitsky, commenting on the situation, said, “If he (rush) actually saw themselves geopolitical and helped Hillary, it is necessary to draw conclusions, it’s wrong… I’m with him (Sytnik) in 2016 was the conversation at the conference in Panama, and he also said to me that he wants to help Hillary. My question is “Where are you, where’s Hillary” there was no answer”.
The leak of the records of the so-called “black accounting” in the US media, also known as “Ledger” of the Party of regions became the reason of resignation of P. Manafort from campaign D. trump and led to one of the key charges in the investigation of the conspiracy with Russia, which pursues D. trump in the last two and a half years. According to The New York Times, “black accounting” name of Manafort mentioned 22 times. Overall it was about the payment in the amount of $12.7 million, implemented during 2007-2012.